The coming year looks interesting in terms of RPGs, but almost all releases that really look promising were already mentioned in my last year’s post, they just didn’t came out in 2022. The new additions to RPGWatch’s upcoming releases list are less impressive, especially among “real” RPGs (tactical games are maybe more interesting).
Let’s begin with the obvious: b>Baldur’s Gate 3 and Warhammer 40,000: Rogue Trader are THE top dogs in this year’s “RPG of the Year” battle, and everyone already knows about both, so there is no point mentioning them further or speculating on the true release dates. With that in mind, let’s move on to less shiny releases. As always, I only write about games which I might find interesting – which mostly means isometric turn-based RPGs and tactics, or at least something with promising mechanics or non-standard setting.
Release dates are from RPGWatch, and can be unaccurate.
I don’t have much free time currently, so I’ll be brief this time and only write about games I think I’ll find interesting. Which means mostly isometric, mostly turn-based, and no JRPGs.
Original post at Pathfinder CRPG – Wrath of the Righteous page in Facebook.
Creating computer games is a tricky business, and all good tricks include a lot of smoke, mirrors and hidden trapdoors. Sometimes, though, the smoke gets sucked into the trapdoor and the assistant’s twin walks head-first into the mirror because she can’t see anything. In the case of computer games, this usually leads to bug reports. This series of posts offers a behind the scenes look at some of the notable bugs in Pathfinder: Wrath of the Righteous.
Pathfinder tabletop system is incredibly complex. It includes a huge number of interacting rules and content based on said rules, which sometimes overrides them and creates special cases. Because of that, even a simple question like “how much damage can that character do” requires complex calculations. Of course, we make these calculations whenever the character attacks someone, but that’s not the only time when we need minimum and maximum damage values.
So, both me and Razgriz were pretty silent for a long while. Sorry about that, changes in our lives, etc. etc. I, for one, joined the illustrious Owlcat Games studio to work on Pathfinder: Kingmaker and future CRPGs. Here’s an article I wrote about my experience on adding turn-based mode to Pathfinder: Kingmaker, which is what I, along with my colleagues, were working for quite a while:
I’ve been doing some work with Ethereum blockchain recently, and the idea I worked on requires that we write a relatively large array of integer values in smart contract’s storage. Now, most tutorials warn you not to store a lot of data on blockchain, because it’s very costly. But how much is “a lot”, and at which point the price becomes too high for practical purposes? I needed to find that out, since we really needed this data on-chain.
For a quick approximation, let’s have a look at a wide-spread type of contract, ERC20 token. At the very least, it stores a mapping of addresses to token holders’ balances. The address is a 20-byte value, and the balance is usually 32 bytes, so we have at least 52 bytes per token holder, which in reality translate to 64 bytes, since the storage in EVM is parceled in 32-byte blocks. A somewhat popular token can easily have 10000 or more holders, so our estimate that it stores about 625Kb of information. That’s quite a lot, actually – more than enough for our purposes, since by our estimates, we only needed to store maybe tens of kilobytes!
So, let’s go ahead and pass that data to EVM and write it down to the storage:
The criteria for inclusion of a game in my list is specified in Part I. Continued from Part II.
2018 seems to be a year of spiritual successors. Not exactly sequels – for copyright reasons – but games that draw directly and unashamedly on a single source, rather than the whole corpus of “old-school RPGs”, as was often the case in the previous years. Whether any of those “successors” prove to be of any worth remains to be seen.
The criteria for inclusion of a game in my list is specified in Part I.
All in all, 2018 seems to be an interesting year for RPG and tactic gamers – more so than 2016, and even 2017. What awaits us in the coming months?
I decided to post my yearly overview of released and upcoming RPGs and tactics in English this time. Some explanations before I proceed further.
This list will only included games released, or announced for 2018, and only those games that I consider to be of interest to me. This means it mostly consist of turn-based and/or isometric RPGs and tactics, though sometimes I make exceptions for high-profile games or titles I consider to be interesting because of something else. However, there will be almost no mentions of non-tactical JRPGs, as I’m completely uninterested in the genre and can’t provide any comments on it, as well as most action-RPGs, including AAA titles. Oh, yeah, and the list is text-only, but with links to game’s site, for the sake of brevity.
Projects that I consider to be the most interesting are marked with ☆ sign.
With that in mind, let’s recount what titles have already been released in 2018 at this point.
An article about the development of Return of Dr. Destructo is now up at Edamame.
A few of my colleagues and me decided to try our hand at creating an RPG. Now, this is a long process, and we’re presently at the very beginning, and none of us are experienced game designers. So the only way to go is to prototype, iterate and playtest.
Today, I invite you to test a combat system for this RPG. It looks a lot like JRPG/Dungeo Crawler combat, but I tried to make it a bit different from the usual fare in these genres, by putting emphasis on difficulty of each combat, instead of dungeon (a sequence of combats) as a whole. So, health and mana of all characters are fully restored after each battle, like in many modern western games.
The test is quite simple: you have to fight 5 battles of increasing difficulty until you defeat a boss. This should take less then an hour, I believe (and so there are no save/loads). I’ve been working on this for some weeks in the evenings, so don’t expect much of it, especially visually, but I think it should be playable enough for more-or-less experienced players now. The test is programmed in C++, but is compiled for web via Emscripten.
I welcome all feedback you can give: what did you like, what frustrated you, what was funny etc. Please do not hesitate to write a comment to this post, or drop me a line by e-mail.